Gait Games

I’m losing you, naked blue placeholder person with a tiny red blaster and tiny bare bottom standing on my arm! Wait, what was that? Oh no, I, purple-faced placeholder robo-person am being sucked out of an airlock, as is my partner, red-faced placeholder robo-person. Our bare bottoms will never survive in the lethal void of space! It’s ok, though. Thanks to some quick thinking, we’ll make it out of what appears to be an early-in-production cinematic from the first interation of the Star Wars: Knights Of The Old Republic remake, which has been in relative development limbo for a while now.

Read more

### Sony Confronts Class Action Lawsuit Regarding IEEPA Tariff Refunds

In the past weeks, Sony has become embroiled in a new class action lawsuit, showcasing a pattern of legal difficulties the company is encountering. The most recent suit, named **Walker et al v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC**, has been lodged in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs allege that Sony has inappropriately gained from tariffs levied by the federal government under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

#### Context of the Charges

The lawsuit states that Sony stands to achieve a “double recovery windfall” from the IEEPA tariff refunds associated with the Trump administration’s strategies. The plaintiffs assert that during the duration of these tariffs, Sony elevated the prices of its PlayStation consoles to mitigate financial burdens. Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has determined that the tariffs were illegal, refunds are being distributed to firms that settled the tariffs, creating what the plaintiffs claim is an unjust scenario for consumers.

Recently, Sony proclaimed price hikes for the PlayStation consoles, which involved considerable increases that came into effect on August 20, 2025, and again on May 27, 2026. On April 20, 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) initiated a tariff refund website, showcasing the possible financial gains for importers impacted by the tariffs.

#### The Plaintiffs’ Claims

The main argument of the lawsuit is that although Sony escalated prices to offset the tariffs, obtaining refunds on those tariffs post-factum implies that the company could be profiting twice: first from the heightened prices and subsequently from the tariff refunds. Specifically, during the indicated timeframe, the prices for various PlayStation 5 models experienced considerable hikes—$150 for both the disc and digital editions, and $200 for the PlayStation 5 Pro.

The plaintiffs argue that these refunds ought to be transferred to consumers who acquired PlayStation consoles during the span from August 1, 2025, onward. The case is designated as a “Nationwide Class” action, suggesting that if the plaintiffs prevail, all customers who purchased a PlayStation console during this period would be entitled to compensation.

#### Consequences for Consumers

Should they succeed, the outcome of this class action lawsuit could result in financial reparations for a substantial number of consumers who experienced the effects of the price surges for PlayStation consoles. However, as the case was filed only recently on May 6, 2026, it remains too soon to estimate the total sum that might be awarded to consumers in the event of a plaintiff victory.

As lawsuits of this nature gain momentum, it underscores the necessity for consumers to be aware of pricing methodologies and the potential effects of trade policies on retail prices. This situation parallels other legal disputes in the gaming sector, as demonstrated by a similar case against Nintendo concerning tariff refunds, highlighting an intensifying examination of pricing and consumer protection protocols within the gaming market.

In conclusion, Sony’s legal confrontations surrounding tariffs spotlight ongoing conflicts between corporate pricing approaches and consumer entitlements, setting a significant precedent for future litigations in the technology and gaming domains.

The best Robes, Wands, and Wizard Hats.

The post Wizard Alchemy Tier List – Robes, Wands, Wizard Hats appeared first on Gamezebo.

Stop it. Stop trying to make him do it. He won’t. He will not do it. He’s been very clear with you. Yes, you, seemingly random commenter who’s suggested that making Half-Life 3 would be a piece of cake. Former Valve writer Chet Faliszek doesn’t reckon it would be. The mythical sequel’s also not something he’d be interested in penning, because he’s not a fan of having to deal with a tonne of established lore.

Read more

**High-Fidelity Fan Videos and the Possibility of a Final Fantasy VI Remake**

The world of fan creativity has always been dynamic, particularly within the gaming sector. High-fidelity fan videos illustrating what a possible remake of *Final Fantasy VI* might resemble have been in circulation for years. Recently, however, innovations in generative AI have greatly eased the creation of these imaginative pieces, enabling fans to readily share their creative visions on social media. A key example of this trend is the recent AI-generated “remake” sizzle reel inspired by *Final Fantasy VI*, which has drawn the attention and acclaim of both fans and industry professionals.

On May 16, an X user known as desusanJP shared a nearly two-minute AI-generated sizzle reel for *Final Fantasy VI*. Set to Terra’s theme from the original game, the video portrayed a reimagined storyline rife with beloved characters and scenes from the classic SNES RPG. The fan’s request for Square Enix to contemplate a remake of *Final Fantasy VI* was succinctly encapsulated in their post: “Please remake FF6.” The video presented a third-person over-the-shoulder perspective of Terra navigating through various towns and dungeons, showcasing memorable instances such as Sabin’s iconic suplex of a haunted train.

The sizzle reel rapidly gained traction, eliciting a surge of excitement among fans. Comments commending the quality and nostalgia of the visuals flooded in. One fan conveyed their enthusiasm, stating, “This is insane, it’s amazing…I really wanna play it…*FF6* is truly something else.” The fervor surrounding the video prompted Hironobu Sakaguchi, the creator of the franchise, to express his thoughts. His response—“What is this?! That’s amazing!”—indicated genuine appreciation, though it was unclear whether he recognized its AI origins. While many praised the execution, others critiqued certain elements of the video, including the unnatural character movements and a lack of depth in visual styling.

Furthering the discussion, Akitoshi Kawazu, the director of *Romancing SaGa* and a combat designer for the original *Final Fantasy* titles, also acknowledged the appetite for a remake. However, he refrained from specifying his views on the aesthetic choices in the AI video. The variance in opinions underscores a broader dialogue about fans’ differing expectations for a *Final Fantasy VI* remake. Some fans visualize a more traditional retro art style, while others are fascinated by the idea of hyper-realism, fostering a complex conversation about the potential directions a remake could take.

Despite these conversations, the notion of a remake for *Final Fantasy VI* has continued to resonate among fans and developers alike. Many view it as one of the pinnacles of the series and have advocated for a contemporary interpretation for years. Yet, Yoshinori Kitase, a prominent figure at Square Enix, suggested that delivering a remake could be an extensive process, possibly taking up to two decades to finalize.

As generative AI continues to influence how fans articulate their visions, the yearning for a *Final Fantasy VI* remake persists as a central theme within the gaming community. The fusion of cutting-edge technology and enduring nostalgia keeps the dream alive, encouraging both players and developers to explore the possibilities of reimagining one of the most revered RPGs in gaming history.

Slime out your enemies.

The post Slime RNG Slime Gun Upgrades – Worth The Investment? appeared first on Gamezebo.

There are whispers on the wind that a new trailer for Grand Theft Auto 6 will be out this week. There were whispers it would be last week, too. Whenever the next look at Rockstar’s open world crime-’em-up arrives, it’s unlikely it will have the cultural impact of Grand Theft Auto 4’s second trailer.

Not even Rockstar had an inkling of what GTA 4’s trailers would kick off. In part because it’s got nothing to do with Niko Bellic, his cousin, or even bowling.

Read more

**The Rising Tension Between Graduates and AI Enthusiasm: Insights from Recent Commencement Addresses**

During recent college graduation events, a notable discontent has surfaced regarding the narrative surrounding artificial intelligence (AI). At the University of Arizona’s spring graduation, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt encountered substantial criticism as he promoted the potential of AI, facing loud boos from graduates concerned about their future in an AI-centric world. Schmidt’s comments mirrored a similar reaction earlier in the month when businesswoman Gloria Caulfield was met with jeers at the University of Central Florida after describing AI as the “next industrial revolution.”

The core of Schmidt’s address highlighted a vital dichotomy: while recognizing the legitimate fears related to AI—such as job loss and environmental consequences—he encouraged graduates to engage actively with the technology and become the architects of the future they wish to create. He conveyed that accepting a predetermined future equates to relinquishing one’s agency, urging graduates to mold the technologies that could impact their lives.

Schmidt’s discussion focused on the notion that the future is not a passive event but an active creation involving the efforts of individuals in laboratories, startups, classrooms, and legislative environments. He claimed, “The future does not simply arrive, it gets built,” stressing that the responsibility to shape AI lies with the emerging generation, the very individuals who would either gain or suffer from its effects. He motivated them to infuse human values into the discussions where AI decisions are made, reminding them that technology is a tool dependent on the ethical guidance provided by its developers.

Nevertheless, Schmidt’s message conflicted with his own portrayal of the scenario. By asserting that “the rocket ship is here” and suggesting graduates simply “get on,” he implied an acceptance of an AI-dominated future, contradicting his earlier message promoting agency and engagement. This inconsistency did not resonate positively with students who recognize the threat posed to their job prospects by ongoing technological automation.

The responses to Schmidt’s and Caulfield’s addresses highlight a broader sentiment among graduates—many of whom feel unprepared to navigate an uncertain job market increasingly shaped by AI. Their frustrations are magnified by corporate narratives that often overlook or minimize the immediate impacts of disruptive technologies on employment and social frameworks.

Schmidt’s failure to meaningfully connect with the graduates signifies a persistent gap between the optimistic visions of tech leaders and the lived realities of young individuals facing rapidly changing job markets. This disconnect raises important questions about the moral obligations of those in positions of power within technology and business sectors. It invites reflection on how to bridge the gap between progressive innovation and the socioeconomic challenges encountered by the emerging workforce.

As we observe the evolving relationship between graduates and advocates of AI, it remains uncertain whether future speakers will heed the adverse reactions experienced by Schmidt and Caulfield. The backlash indicates a growing awareness among graduates that accepting AI as an unavoidable force may not be in their best interests, prompting a reassessment of the conversation surrounding AI’s societal role.

Ultimately, the graduates’ responses at commencement ceremonies represent a call for more nuanced dialogues about AI—ones that genuinely address their concerns, highlight shared responsibilities, and promote ethical interaction with emerging technologies. The future, indeed, should be constructed collaboratively, ensuring that the values and viewpoints of the younger generation are fundamental to the development of the technologies ahead.

Use potions to unlock temporary spells.

The post Wizard Alchemy Potions – Requirements and Materials appeared first on Gamezebo.

EVE Vanguard, the latest attempt by Fenris ‘I Can’t Believe It’s Not CCP Games‘ Creations at crafting a first-person shooter counterpart to EVE Online, continues to gestate within Iceland’s best-funded spinoff vats. Nearly three years after being revealed as a Shoot, Loot ‘n’ Scoot extraction game, it’s running its first alpha playtest – titled Operation Avalon – from July 7th-20th, with Fenris staff promising attendees of last week’s EVE FanFest event that it will dutifully tighten up the gunplay that players of previous ‘pre-alpha’ tests criticised as loose and floaty.

More intriguing, however, is what the company calls an “economic bridge” between EVEs Vanguard and Online: the ability to conduct on-foot Vanguard raids into ship graveyards, containing parts salvaged from real player-owned ships that were destroyed in the MMO’s space dogfights, before putting those parts up for sale back inside EVE Online itself. Thus opening a potential lifeline for defeated ship captains desperate to reclaim their stuff – or, perhaps more likely, the EVE universe’s biggest new hardware ransoming operation.

Read more