

The Indie Game Awards (IGA), known for annually honoring the finest in indie games, has recently encountered controversy following the retraction of three of its awards, including the prestigious Game of the Year. The event, which took place last week, originally celebrated *Clair Obscur: Expedition 33* with two major accolades: Game of the Year and Best Debut Indie. However, the validity of these awards was called into question when claims emerged concerning the developers, Sandfall Interactive, allegedly failing to reveal their use of generative AI in the game’s creation during the submission phase.
The IGA prides itself on its progressive principles and commitment to the indie community, making it clear that it does not endorse games produced with generative AI tools. Mike Towndrow from Six One Indie, the organization responsible for the IGAs, disclosed that Sandfall had previously assured the committee that no generative AI was utilized in the game’s development. It was only at the awards ceremony that the truth emerged, leading the IGA’s nomination committee to revoke the accolades for both Game of the Year and Best Debut Indie. In response to these developments, the Game of the Year award has been transferred to *Blue Prince*, and the Best Debut Indie award has gone to *Sorry We’re Closed* from à la mode games.
In addition to the retraction of *Clair Obscur*, the IGA also rescinded the Indie Vanguard recognition for *Chantey*, a Game Boy-style title from Greek developer Gortyn Code. This decision was influenced by Gortyn Code’s distribution partnership with ModRetro, a company owned by Palmer Luckey, who is known for his controversial connections to the arms industry through his venture, Anduril Industries. In its statement, the IGA underscored that the disqualification of the Indie Vanguard award was not a judgment on Gortyn Code or *Chantey*, but rather a result of ModRetro’s ties to the arms trade and the IGA’s adherence to its ethical standards.
The retractions have ignited debates about the influence of ideology in award considerations, with some critics arguing against the incorporation of such values in artistic recognition. However, as an independently governed entity, the Indie Game Awards maintains the right to establish and uphold its own criteria, distinct from other awards ceremonies.
This event underscores the ongoing dialogue about the implications of technology, especially AI, in creative fields, as well as the ethical obligations that accompany innovation. The IGA’s choice to retract awards demonstrates a commitment to transparency and integrity within the indie gaming community, reinforcing the need for clear standards in a changing environment. The awards ceremony continues to promote appreciation for indie games, highlighting values of honesty and artistic authenticity. For additional information regarding the awards and the validity of the finalists, the IGA FAQ offers further insights.
READ ARTICLE



















