Guide to Haze Seas Haki: Requirements and Upgrades for Buso, Observation, and Conqueror’s Haki

Regular RPS readers might remember me writing a couple of times last year about a modder kicking off an attempt at porting Morrowind into Elden Ring. Their early progress looked promising, if living under the cloud of several complex things the group would have to figure out in some form to get it working.

After about half a year of major updateless silence, modder InfernoPlus has emerged from the dungeons of Vvardenfell to reveal that the mod’s now “mostly playable”, following several months of battling a number of infuriatingly complex issues.

Read more

**The Fondness of Nintendo DS RPGs and the Vanishing Bargain Bin**

In the realm of gaming, few moments can stir feelings of nostalgia as effectively as discovering a hidden treasure in a second-hand bargain bin. One such treasure is the eccentric Nintendo DS RPG *Contact*, crafted by Grasshopper Manufacture. Launched in the mid-2000s, this game takes substantial inspiration from the cherished classic *Earthbound*, merging unconventional storytelling with captivating gameplay features.

Despite its distinctive allure, *Contact* often gets eclipsed by more prevalent titles, highlighted by its humble Metacritic rating that leaves many unfamiliar with its whimsical universe. For just $5, it was a bargain for anyone fortunate enough to find it in a GameStop bargain bin—an encounter that ignited fond memories for countless players.

The act of rummaging through those disorderly bins, brimming with a variety of pre-owned games, holds a special significance for numerous gamers. Such bins were frequently chaotic, stuffed with everything from unwanted sports games to obsolete shooters, but therein lay the excitement of discovery. The pleasure of digging through these heaps could lead to a delightful surprise—rare RPGs like *Evolution Worlds*, the intriguing *Ar Tonelico*, or even various versions of the *Art Academy* series.

Contemplating the decline of physical media, many gamers convey a sense of grief as the prevalence of these bargain bins declines. The slow transition to digital consumption has resulted in a scarcity of chances to uncover inexpensive games in the wild. Although some retail stores still provide used game sections, the experience of sifting through a cluttered bin filled with forgotten titles is becoming increasingly uncommon.

As the gaming environment transforms—culminating in forecasts that physical disc games might entirely disappear by 2028—collectors and aficionados may see their cherished game hunting adventures vanish into the shadows. The days of snagging legendary titles at unmatched prices like 4 for $20 could soon be a distant recollection, leaving future generations without the joys of such fortunate discoveries.

The nostalgia surrounding the search for unique games in bargain bins has transcended eras, and the connections forged through these moments remain meaningful. As gamers look back on their favorite finds, they treasure the enduring impressions these experiences have imprinted on their gaming journeys. Whether it’s the exhilaration of uncovering an underrated *Tales* title or reliving the thrill of finding *The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers* amidst a multitude of sports games, these instances create lasting memories.

As we approach a future dominated by digital media, it’s vital to preserve the spirit of discovery. Sharing tales of past finds and reflecting on the allure of bargain bins could guarantee that these treasured experiences are never overlooked. So, whether you’ve stumbled upon a classic RPG or an obscure indie gem, let’s celebrate the delight of unearthing video game treasures and keep those memories alive for future generations.

### The Debate Surrounding Ruairí Robinson’s AI Video Assertion

On February 10, 2026, filmmaker Ruairí Robinson drew attention with a provocative statement on X (formerly Twitter). He alleged that an intricate video featuring actors Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt in a fight scene was created using only a two-line prompt with the AI tool Seedance 2. Robinson’s claim, bolstered by supplementary footage, sparked conversations in the film and tech sectors about the capabilities of AI in video creation. However, as the discussions progressed, it became evident that Robinson’s assertions might not hold up under examination.

#### The AI Video Breakthrough?

Robinson’s message implied that if his assertion was accurate, it would signify a revolutionary milestone in AI video technology. For years, AI advocates have vowed astonishing developments, yet often deliver disappointing outcomes deemed as “snake oil.” The video in question, known for its exceptional choreography, high-quality cinematography, and adept lighting, seemed to surpass the shortcomings typically seen in other AI-generated videos.

Nonetheless, the actual scenario of AI video generation has frequently been hindered by irregularities, especially in replicating natural camera movements. Aron Peterson, a writer and software developer experienced in film production, began to doubt Robinson’s narrative. Peterson’s investigation into Seedance 2.0, the AI tool responsible for the video, revealed concerning findings.

#### Revealing the Facts

Peterson’s inquiry into the functionalities of Seedance 2.0 indicated that although the tool is indeed impressive, the illustrative video may not have been as simple as Robinson indicated. Citing earlier demonstrations of AI video creators, Peterson observed a recurring problem with mimicking authentic camera movements. However, the Cruise/Pitt video demonstrated believable camera movement, raising doubts about its legitimacy.

Further examination led Peterson to find that the footage shown in the Seedance 2.0 demonstration closely mirrored pre-existing green screen clips of stunt performers executing similar fight choreography. This prompted Peterson to conclude that rather than relying solely on AI-generated elements, the end result likely included combining existing footage with face swap technology—a technique that would undermine the claim of being completely AI-produced.

Peterson questioned, “Was the input genuinely just a 2 line prompt, or was it in fact 2 lines, green screen video footage, and face references as well?” His findings were reinforced by comparisons he uploaded on YouTube, shedding light on the difference between authentically innovative AI functions and the repurposing of existing content disguised as new creation.

#### The Consequences

The discussions surrounding Robinson’s claim underscore ongoing conflicts between technological progress and authenticity in filmmaking. As David Slack, a television writer, notably stated, “In other words, like most AI hype — it was a con.” This perspective resonates with individuals who recognize AI’s potential yet remain wary of its existing shortcomings and ethical concerns.

As the film industry contends with the rise of AI technology, this incident serves as a reminder to critically scrutinize extraordinary assertions. The allure of an AI-led future in visual storytelling is appealing; however, it is vital to differentiate between genuine innovation and exaggerated narratives that could impede advancement in the future. The debate ignited by Robinson’s assertion may just mark the onset of a larger dialogue concerning the amalgamation of technology and creativity in visual media.